Tahoe ski resorts desperate for worker housing are even turning to brutal campsites
With winter approaching and scant housing options for employees who hawk lift tickets or concessions, Palisades ski resort in Tahoe tried an online experiment last year.
The company opened a campground near Highway 89, where workers could park their vans and brave the snowy months with no heat, water or electricity. Palisades operated and maintained the campsite, which boasted a single amenity: waterless toilets with holding tanks underneath.
It was perhaps the most powerful illustration yet of a housing crisis gripping mountain towns in the Sierra, which rely on tourism to fuel their local economies — even as tourists squeeze the housing stock and generate more demand for low-wage workers.
Palisades secured a special-use permit to lease the campground from the US Forest Service, hoping to promote van living as an alternative for people with nowhere else to go.
“The idea was, in part, can we tap into this ‘van life’ lifestyle?” US Forest Service District Ranger Jonathan Cook-Fisher recalled, noting how Palisades drew inspiration from a social media trend when it launched a “pilot program” with six campsites on the paved surface of Granite Flat Campground.
Yet if van living seems romantic on Instagram, the reality at this campsite was considerably less glamorous. Crews fought to plow snow from land previously unoccupied in the winter months, while a site “host” was assigned to keep campers safe in harsh conditions.
“The fact is, winter camping can be hugely challenging,” Cook-Fisher said, calling the Granite Flat camp “indicative of the lengths communities are going to come up with solutions” to the dearth of affordable housing.
A spokesperson for Palisades said many employees were living in vans or mobile homes already and needed a “steady, predictable, safe place to park without having to move frequently.”
“We saw the campground as a viable solution,” spokesperson Kat Walton said. The resort tried pursuing other forms of housing for its workers with limited success. According to Walton, Palisades bought eight units to house 24 employees at Kings Beach. Last month, a Superior Court judge quashed its plan to build out the Olympic Valley ski area with a new village, hotels, condominiums and lodging for up to 300 employees.
Now, as Palisades and the Forest Service plan to expand the program to up to 26 campsites this winter — possibly with electric hookups, Walton said — other employers are seeking to replicate it.
A few are also eyeing dormitory housing, while one business owner filled an RV lot with tiny cabins for his employees. Placer County is trying its own piecemeal solutions, ranging from mortgage down payment assistance to a cap on short-term rentals to, most recently, grants for landlords who rent property on seasonal or long-term leases — a way to free up homes that otherwise sit vacant when tourist season ends.
Taken together, these measures reflect the desperation to sustain a local workforce in a region where real estate prices are soaring much faster than wages and where rising demand for vacation homes is constricting the housing supply.
But while local officials contend they are trying to be creative in the face of a daunting problem, pro-housing advocates say the predicament won’t go away until Tahoe leaders start pushing for dense apartments or deed restrictions to reserve housing for workers.
Otherwise, they’re merely “nibbling around the edges,” said Matthew Lewis, a spokesperson for the statewide group California YIMBY, which advocates for increased housing development statewide.
“(Placer) County and the town of Truckee have always had the ability to work with the rest of the development community” on more far-reaching measures, namely, setting aside land for workforce housing and subsidizing it with fees on other development, Lewis said. “The fact that they’ve waited so long to really get serious about those measures has put them in a really tough spot.”
Some mountain towns are starting to build affordable housing: Mammoth Lakes funded and is currently constructing 466 affordable units, but other communities don’t appear to be considering development. Cindy Gustafson, chair of the Placer County Board of Supervisors, argued that Tahoe can’t build its way out of a housing scarcity due to regional restrictions on height and development.
“There are limitations to protect Tahoe’s lake environment,” she said, citing rules set decades ago and overseen by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, which controls land in California and Nevada. Gustafson sits on the agency’s governing board and says its members are currently revising those standards.
A COVID-fueled boom in remote work exacerbated the situation. Median home values in Tahoe City skyrocketed during that time, from $964,000 in January 2020 to $1.51 million in June 2022, according to the real estate listings site Zillow. In eastern Placer County, property owners converted more than 65% of the single-family home stock into second homes or vacation rentals, a 2021 study by the Mountain Housing Council found. As a side effect of that short-term rental boom, many residences stay empty most of the year, in spite of all the residents who need a place to live.
“Vacation rentals have been part of our culture for 40, 50 years,” Gustafson said, noting, however, that the rental conversions got out of hand during the pandemic. “Homes became full-time occupied by so many short-term renters. ”
As rents climb and properties remain uninhabited, businesses are struggling to hire and retain workforces. Many restaurant and hospitality workers can’t afford to live in Tahoe, and even government employees commute from as far away as Roseville, Meyers or South Shore, where housing is cheaper. Cook-Fisher said he drives 50 miles one-way from his home in South Shore to his job in the Truckee Ranger District.
Gustafson, who has lived in Tahoe City for 40 years, said she sees signs of the housing crunch everywhere, from the proliferation of help-wanted signs in store windows to the number of people who are driving staggeringly long distances to get to work to the seasonal workers who opt to sleep in cars or vans, rather than pay to rent a cabin or studio apartment. She’s seen businesses sputter or cut their hours. The post office pared back its counter service, she said.
Scott Smelser, a Tahoe native and owner of Blue Mountain Painting, said he felt the strain when his workers began migrating to Reno and Carson City, Nev., trading long commutes for cheaper housing.
“They’re driving upwards of 50 miles one way,” Smelser said, adding that he’s had to organize paint crews so that those who live near each other can carpool, if possible. He’s also raised starting wages above $20 an hour and offered stipends to help defray the cost of gas.
Still, more and more residents fear they may have to leave the area. Nigel Wheeler, a fishing guide and single father of two, is still among the holdouts. He moved to Tahoe more than a decade ago as a penniless teenager, working low-pay ski resort jobs and sharing a $300-a-month room with a fellow ski bum.
Since then Wheeler has weathered two housing booms, the first triggered by a rush for vacation rentals, he said, the second by remote workers who wanted a taste of mountain life. Over the past year, Wheeler’s landlord raised the rent on his two-bedroom house in Meyers three times — from $1,500 to $1,950.
“I have a lot of friends who were born and raised here, and now they live in Guerneville or Carson City and commute,” Wheeler said. “I’ll just make it work.”
One longtime Tahoe merchant vented his frustration, saying the region is hamstrung by residents’ and officials’ unwillingness to build affordable dwellings.
“The NIMBY problem is everywhere,” said Dave Wilderotter, owner of Tahoe Dave’s Skis and Boards. He’s been buying real estate in the area for years, including an RV trailer park where he placed 25 tiny cabins for his employees to rent, at $1,000 a month. Each one is 400 square feet, with a stove, bathroom and granite countertops.
Apart from Truckee, most towns are unincorporated and live under the decisions of the Placer County supervisors or the bi-state Regional Planning Agency. That alone has caused tension, as some residents pine for more local control.
If Wilderotter had his preference, Tahoe and other towns would have their own local governments, and eastern Placer County would set up a trust to spend on housing.
“Then I’d convince the retirees and second-home owners that it’s OK to build an affordable complex in their neighborhood,” he said, grumbling about NIMBYs as he drank a glass of Zinfandel on a restaurant patio on Monday. Smoke from distant wildfires was gradually dissipating in the sky, now frothy and blue against the undulating lake.
“It’s still beautiful,” Wilderotter said. “It’s not like we want to leave.”
Rachel Swan is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: [email protected] Twitter: @rachelswan